A second opinion, before it becomes a second programme.
An objective, evidence-led assessment of a Temenos programme already in flight. You receive a technical health scorecard, a prioritised risk register and a findings report you can act on.
- Milestones keep sliding by a sprint and nobody can say why
- Integration debt is growing and no one owns it
- The board wants an independent view before the next funding gate
- You are weighing a vendor's assurance against your own team's doubts
Most troubled core banking programmes show the same early signals. Scope drifts. Milestones slide “by a sprint”. Integration debt accumulates and nobody owns it. A review surfaces these while they are still cheap to fix.
How a review runs
We separate what is measured from what is reported. A user estimate is never presented as an instrumented result, a vendor assertion is never treated as a demonstrated capability, and a missing piece of evidence stays visible as an open question rather than being filled by assumption.
| Step | What we do | You receive |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Structured interviews with programme leadership, architects and delivery leads | Stakeholder alignment map |
| 02 | Objective assessment of architecture, configuration, data and test state against Temenos practice | Technical health scorecard |
| 03 | Risk identification with likelihood, impact and ownership | Prioritised risk register |
| 04 | Practical recovery and acceleration options with effort and sequencing | Findings report |
What a review is not
It is not a sales exercise for a replacement, a rescue team or a new vendor. The outcome is decision support. If the right answer is to stay the course with three changes, that is what the report says.
Named deliverables, not a statement of intent.
who believes what about scope, status and risk, and where those views diverge
architecture, configuration, data and test state assessed against Temenos practice
each risk with likelihood, impact and a named owner
recovery and acceleration options with effort and sequencing, written for a decision
